The Role of Public Associations in Elevating the Legal Culture of Youth: Foreign Experience
Keywords:
Youth legal culture, public associations, NGOs, civil society, international experience, Street Law, political education, social partnership, legal awareness, digital literacyAbstract
This article investigates how public associations and non-governmental non-profit organizations contribute to the development of legal culture among young people through practical education, civic participation and access to legal support. Its purpose is to identify transferable institutional mechanisms from selected European countries, the United States, the United Kingdom and South Korea, while distinguishing contextual differences that limit direct policy transplantation. The study uses qualitative document review, comparative institutional analysis and thematic synthesis of the examples discussed in the source article. The comparison considers four dimensions: non-formal legal education, experiential participation, digital access and cooperation between government bodies and civil society. Results reveal a recurring set of mechanisms, including Germany’s civic education initiatives, the participatory structures of Nordic youth councils, Street Law and simulated judicial proceedings in the United States, youth advocacy forums in the United Kingdom, and digital legal-information activities in South Korea. These examples suggest that legal literacy may be strengthened when instruction is linked to realistic choices, rights-protection procedures and opportunities for meaningful participation. However, program effectiveness depends on accessible delivery, organizational independence, qualified facilitators and continuous evaluation. The article develops recommendations for adapting these practices to local legal and institutional conditions through school–NGO partnerships, legal clinics, interactive tools and youth feedback systems. As a comparative conceptual study, it does not claim to establish causal effects or measure changes in youth behavior; future evaluations should assess outcomes through transparent indicators and longitudinal observation.

